Kaiser Development Company v. City And County Of Honolulu
Opinion
Opinion
913 F.2d 573 KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, aka Kacor Development Company, a California corporation; Kaiser Hawaii Kai Development Co., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Richard Lyman, Jr.; Matsuo Takabuki; Myron B. Thompson; William S. Richardson; Henry H. Peters, Jr., Plaintiffs/Intervenors, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 87-2689, 87-2690. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 1988. Memorandum Filed March 21, 1990. Opinion Sept. 4, 1990. Barbara R. Banke, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Gideon Kanner, Burbank, Cal., for plaintiffs/intervenors-appellants. H. Bissell Carey, III, Robinson & Cole, Hartford, Conn., for defendant-appellee. Warren Price, III, Atty. Gen. of the State of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant-appellee. John K. Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen. of the State of Cal., Andrea Sheridan Ordin, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., N. Gregory Taylor, Theodora Berger, Asst. Attys. Gen., Mary Gray Holt, Gail Ruderman Feuer, Deputy Attys. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae, John K. Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen. of the State of Cal. Appeal from the United States…