United States v. State Of Oregon

Caution
913 F.2d 576·20 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21232·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 14786
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 199088-4311California7,802 words

Opinion

Opinion

913 F.2d 576 20 Envtl. L. Rep. 21 ,232 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation, et al.; Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation; Nez Perce Indians, Intervenors-Appellees, State of Idaho, Shoshone-Bannock Tribe, Intervenors-Appellants, Makah Indian Tribe, Applicant in Intervention Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON; State of Washington, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 88-4311, 88-4316 and 88-4347. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1990. Decided Aug. 27, 1990. Marc D. Slonim and Alvin J. Ziontz, Ziontz, Chestnut, Varnell, Berley & Slonim, Seattle, Wash., Clive J. Strong and Charles F. Adams, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, Idaho, and Howard A. Funke, Fort Hall, Idaho, for defendants-intervenors-appellants. Dirk D. Snel, Land & Natural Resources Div., and M. Alice Thurston, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee. Howard G. Arnett, Marceau, Karnopp, Petersen, Noteboom & Hubel, Bend, Oregon, Timothy Weaver, Cockrill, Weaver & Bjur, Yakima, Wash., Craig Dorsay, Oregon Legal Services and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.