United States v. State Of Oregon
Opinion
Opinion
913 F.2d 576 20 Envtl. L. Rep. 21 ,232 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation, et al.; Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation; Nez Perce Indians, Intervenors-Appellees, State of Idaho, Shoshone-Bannock Tribe, Intervenors-Appellants, Makah Indian Tribe, Applicant in Intervention Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON; State of Washington, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 88-4311, 88-4316 and 88-4347. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1990. Decided Aug. 27, 1990. Marc D. Slonim and Alvin J. Ziontz, Ziontz, Chestnut, Varnell, Berley & Slonim, Seattle, Wash., Clive J. Strong and Charles F. Adams, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, Idaho, and Howard A. Funke, Fort Hall, Idaho, for defendants-intervenors-appellants. Dirk D. Snel, Land & Natural Resources Div., and M. Alice Thurston, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee. Howard G. Arnett, Marceau, Karnopp, Petersen, Noteboom & Hubel, Bend, Oregon, Timothy Weaver, Cockrill, Weaver & Bjur, Yakima, Wash., Craig Dorsay, Oregon Legal Services and…