Endereson

914 F.2d 262 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert ENDRESON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Defendant-Appellee No. 89-15946. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 10, 1990. * Decided Sept. 25, 1990. Before CHAMBERS, FARRIS, and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 2 1 Defendant Enderson, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. 1983 action challenging the prison's "Inmate Personal Property Policy", IMP 301.17. 2 Defendant states that IMP 301.17 deprives him of property without due process of law, however, as the Supreme Court noted in Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 554 (1979): 3 "... due process rights of prisoners and pretrial detainees [against the deprivation of their property without due process of law] are not absolute; they are subject to reasonable limitation or retraction in light of the legitimate security concerns of the…