Jesse J. Sanchez Victor Torres Robert Caro v. City of Santa Ana, and City of Santa Ana Police Department Don Botts Raymond C. Davis E.B. Hansen Robert Stebbens Norwood Williams Lee Drummond Lawrence Pitzer Michael Llewellyn Dale Sterzer Gary Dixon John Collins John McDaniels Michael Lanners William Bruns John Dittus Richard Faust John McClain Jesse J. Sanchez Victor Torres Robert Caro v. City of Santa Ana, and Robert Stebbens Norwood Williams Lee Drummond Lawrence Pitzer Michael Llewellyn Dale Sterzer Gary Dixon John Collins John McDaniels Michael Lanners William Bruns John Dittus Richard Faust John McClain

Good Law
915 F.2d 424
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 199088-5827California4,530 words

Opinion

Opinion

915 F.2d 424 Jesse J. SANCHEZ; Victor Torres; Robert Caro, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF SANTA ANA, Defendant-Appellant, and City of Santa Ana Police Department; Don Botts; Raymond C. Davis; E.B. Hansen; Robert Stebbens; Norwood Williams; Lee Drummond; Lawrence Pitzer; Michael Llewellyn; Dale Sterzer; Gary Dixon; John Collins; John McDaniels; Michael Lanners; William Bruns; John Dittus; Richard Faust; John McClain, Defendants. Jesse J. SANCHEZ; Victor Torres; Robert Caro, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF SANTA ANA, Defendant, and Robert Stebbens; Norwood Williams; Lee Drummond; Lawrence Pitzer; Michael Llewellyn; Dale Sterzer; Gary Dixon; John Collins; John McDaniels; Michael Lanners; William Bruns; John Dittus; Richard Faust; John McClain, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 86-6386, 88-5827, 88-5855. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 4, 1989. Opinion Filed July 11, 1990. Opinion Withdrawn July 16, 1990. Decided Sept. 25, 1990. Charles Matheis, Jr., Beam & Brobeck, Santa Ana, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Meir J. Westreich, Glendale, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.