Lockary v. Kayfetz

Good Law
917 F.2d 1150
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 30, 199087-15044California3,532 words

Opinion

Opinion

917 F.2d 1150 Matthew LOCKARY; Susan Irland Lockary; Charles Gilbert; Phyllis Gilbert; James Macey; Anton Holter; Mesa Ranch, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Paul KAYFETZ; Victor Amoroso; Mary Lowry; Diana Lopez Farnsworth; Frederick B. McClellan; Peter Warshall; David L. Van Dusen; Doris Elaine Lemieux; Jack Bowen McClellan; William Niman; Judith Weston, as individuals; Bolinas Community Public Utility District, an incorporated public utility district; Bolinas Planning Council, a nonprofit corporation; John Goodchild; Gregory C. Hewlett; Steve Matson; Patricia L. Smith; Ray Moritz; Robert J. Scarola; Diane Middleton McQuaid; Frederick G. Styles, as individuals; Marin County Planning Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-15044. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1990. Decided July 18, 1990. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Oct. 30, 1990. Richard M. Stephens and Orrin P. Finch, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. R.S. Cathcart, Bledsoe, Cathcart, Leahy, Starr & Diestel, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee, Paul Kayfetz. Richard E.V. Harris, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, San Francisco,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.