Pedro Sauceda v. Department Of Labor & Industries, Of The State Of Washington

Good Law
917 F.2d 1216·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18908
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 30, 199088-4444California1,610 words

Opinion

Opinion

917 F.2d 1216 Pedro SAUCEDA, Plaintiff, and Victor Ruscigno; Laurie L. Johnson; Gretchen L. Hite; Joseph Roybal; Albert Rotti; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES, OF the STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-4444. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1990. * Decided Oct. 30, 1990. Donald J. Koler, Martin, Koler & Lucas, and Norman W. Cohen, Cohen & Keith-Miller, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants. Zimmie Caner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Seattle, Wash., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Before WALLACE, HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: 1 Various individual plaintiffs appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment to the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (Department) and named Department officials, contending that the Department's procedures for suspending their employment disability benefits violated their due process rights. We review this question de novo, and we affirm. BACKGROUND 2 As administrator of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.