United States v. Williams

Good Law
917 F.2d 1308·1990 WL 171597
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 199036-3_1California1,683 words

Opinion

Opinion

917 F.2d 1308 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ralph Rene WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-30108. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1990. Decided Nov. 7, 1990. Before WRIGHT, CHOY and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ralph Williams appeals his conviction for bank robbery. He argues that the court's denial of his motion to suppress was erroneous because the police officer who arrested him lacked reasonable suspicion to stop him and probable cause to make the arrest. He also challenges the district court's ruling on an evidentiary issue, the denial of his motion to vacate his conviction due to alleged prosecutorial misconduct, and the constitutionality of his sentence. We affirm. FACTS 3 On November 14, 1988, a branch of the First Interstate Bank was robbed. A witness saw the robber leave the bank and escape in a getaway…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.