Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,723 in Re Gilbert Alcala, Darlene Alcala, Debtors. Richard A. Canatella v. Edward F. Towers, Trustee

Good Law
918 F.2d 99·1990 WL 165913·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19177
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 199089-15372California2,623 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lively, J.

This case concerns an attempt by an attorney for Chapter 7 debtors in bankruptcy, who was never employed by the trustee, to collect a fee for alleged post-petition services to the bankruptcy estate. The bankruptcy court denied the request for an attorney fee, and the district court affirmed. We agree that the attorney is not entitled to be paid from estate assets, and affirm the judgment of the district court.

I.

Attorney Richard A. Canatella prepared and filed a petition in bankruptcy on behalf of Gilbert Alcala and Darlene Alcala (the debtors) on September 19, 1983. The “Schedules of Assets and Liabilities” filed with the petition listed personal property, consisting of household goods, supplies, and furnishings, wearing apparel, jewelry, etc. with a total value of $7,500. The schedules listed no contingent or unliqui-dated claims. The debtors’ “Statement of Affairs” listed two lawsuits to which the debtors were parties at the time they filed the petition in bankruptcy. One listing disclosed that Gilbert Alcala was a defendant in a state court action that apparently had no connection with the present case. The other listed case was pending in the Bankruptcy Division of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.