Eric F. Weiss Mary E. Weiss v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
919 F.2d 115·1990 WL 180660·66 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5953·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20535·90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8521
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 199089-70148California2,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

In April 1984, the IRS determined deficiencies in Eric and Mary Weiss’s income tax and assessed additional taxes for 1976, 1977, and 1978. The Weisses petitioned the Tax Court for a redetermination and moved the Tax Court to suppress evidence derived from the IRS’s exercise of “institutional bad faith.” This institutional bad faith, which was found to exist by a district judge in a prior criminal prosecution based on the same facts, consisted at least in part of violations of internal agency regulations. However, IRS regulatory violations do not require the suppression of evidence. United States v. Caceres, 440 U.S. 741 , 99 S.Ct. 1465 , 59 L.Ed.2d 733 (1979). On the other hand, it is not clear whether evidence must be suppressed when statutory violations are involved, see Caceres, 440 U.S. at 755 & n. 21, 99 S.Ct. at 1473 & n. 21; United States v. Appoloney, 761 F.2d 520, 522-23 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 949 , 106 S.Ct. 348 , 88 L.Ed.2d 296 (1985); United States v. Snowadzki, 723 F.2d 1427, 1430-31 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 839 , 105 S.Ct. 140 , 83 L.Ed.2d 80 (1984), and the parties are in disagreement on whether the district court found that the IRS had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.