Donnelly

919 F.2d 144 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mary DONNELLY, heir of Pearl Little Estate; et. al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al., Defendants-Appellees, No. 89-35787. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 27, 1990. * Decided Nov. 29, 1990. Before: WALLACE, DAVID R. THOMPSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mary Donnelly and Mary Goldstein ("Donnelly") appeal from the judgment dismissing their action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, see Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir.1990); Mt. Adams Veneer Co. v. United States, 896 F.2d 339, 341 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 1 3 In the complaint, Donnelly, an heir to the Estate of Pearl Little, sought an injunction against the federal government to stop "the removal of my familys [sic] human remains" and development on the…