Salman

919 F.2d 145 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Albert R. SALMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-16225. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 27, 1990. * Decided Nov. 29, 1990. Before WALLACE, DAVID R. THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Albert R. Salman appeals pro se the district court's order granting the government's cross-motion for summary judgment and denying Salman's motion for summary judgment. Salman contends the district court erred in denying his motion for disqualification of the district court judge, and in deciding that the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) response to Salman's requests had satisfied its obligations under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). 3 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Darring v. Kincheloe, 783 F.2d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1986).…