Jones

920 F.2d 936 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William Roger JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth DUCHARME, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-35398. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1990. * Decided Dec. 10, 1990. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Carolyn R. Dimmick, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash., 759 P.2d 1183 . AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and EUGENE A. WRIGHT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Roger Jones appeals the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus. 1 He challenges the imposition of a 280-month sentence following his jury conviction of murder in the first degree while armed with a deadly weapon. Jones argues that his fifth and sixth amendment rights were violated when the state court allowed the prosecution's rebuttal witness to testify regarding Jones' assertion of his privilege against…