United States v. Miranda. United States v. Ortiz. United States v. Diaz.

920 F.2d 937 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Manuel MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenza Diaz dE ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant. 89-30002 to 89-30004. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 9, 1990. Decided Dec. 17, 1990. Before FLETCHER, FARRIS and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Miranda, de Ortiz, and Diaz appeal their convictions for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and use of a telephone to facilitate the conspiracy. Diaz also appeals his conviction for aiding and abetting possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and aiding and abetting interstate travel in aid of racketeering. 3 The defendants argue that the district court made various evidentiary errors. In addition, Miranda claims the court…