Upper Snake River Chapter Of Trout Unlimited v. Hodel

Good Law
90 Daily Journal DAR 14248·921 F.2d 232·21 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20347·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21679·90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9154
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 199089-35142California2,086 words

Opinion

Opinion

921 F.2d 232 119 P.U.R.4th 249 , 21 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,347 UPPER SNAKE RIVER CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED; Idaho Environmental Council; So. Fork Coalition; Idaho Sportsman Coalition; Marv Hoyt, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Donald P. HODEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; C. Dale Duvall, in his official capacity as Chief of the Bureau of Reclamation, Defendants-Appellees, Twin Falls Canal Co.; Committee of Nine; Aberdeen Springfield Canal Co., et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees-Intervenors. No. 89-35142. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 5, 1990. Decided Dec. 17, 1990. Russell E. Webb, Radin & Webb, Idaho Falls, Idaho, for plaintiffs-appellants. George W. Van Cleve, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Land & Natural Resources Div., Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees. Steven K. Tolman, Nelson, Rosholt, Tobertson & Tolma, Twin Falls, Idaho, for defendants-intervenors-appellees-intervenors. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. Before KOELSCH, ALARCON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. KOELSCH, Circuit Judge: 1 The dispositive question on the appeal is this: Did the District Court err in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.