Norman Wayne Willhoite v. Daniel B. Vasquez Attorney General of the State of California, Philip James Syzemore v. Robert M. Rees, Superintendent, Deuel Vocational Institution Attorney General of the State of California

Good Law
90 Daily Journal DAR 14669·921 F.2d 247·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22150·90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9384
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 199089-15801California2,405 words

Opinion

Opinion

921 F.2d 247 Norman Wayne WILLHOITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel B. VASQUEZ; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. Philip James SYZEMORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert M. REES, Superintendent, Deuel Vocational Institution; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. Nos. 89-15801, 89-15829. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1990 * . Decided Dec. 27, 1990. Fern M. Laethem and Sandra Gillies, Public Defenders, Sacramento, Cal., for petitioners-appellants. Raymond L. Brosterhous II, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for respondents-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Norman Wayne Willhoite and Philip James Syzemore ("petitioners"), two California state prisoners, appeal the denial of their petitions for writs of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 . Petitioners argue they were denied due process in their state court trial by the prosecution's failure to disclose part of a plea agreement with a prosecution witness, by the prosecutor's failure to correct what petitioners contend was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.