Henkin v. Northrop Corporation

Good Law
90 Daily Journal DAR 13939·921 F.2d 864·13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1409·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21096·90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8956
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 199089-55683California3,123 words

Opinion

Opinion

921 F.2d 864 59 USLW 2447 , 13 Employee Benefits Ca 1409 Marilyn HENKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHROP CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; the Prudential Insurance Company of America, a New Jersey corporation; Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, a Tennessee corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-55683. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 3, 1990. Decided Dec. 10, 1990. 1 Mark T. Young, Mayer, Glassman & Gaines, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. 2 James J. Moak and Kevin W. Manning, Adams, Duque & Hazeltine, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee The Prudential Ins. Co. of America. 3 Joseph M. Rimac and Kevin W. Manning, Adams, Duque & Hazeltine, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee Provident Life and Acc. Ins. Co. 4 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 5 Before ALARCON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and CALLISTER, * District Judge. CALLISTER, District Judge: 6 In this action brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. Secs. 1001 to 1461 (1988), we must review the interpretation of two insurance policies. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.