Barbara A. Dytrt v. The Mountain State Telephone and Telegraph Company

Bad Law
90 Daily Journal DAR 14243·921 F.2d 889·13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1108·1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21680·90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9151
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 199088-15737, 89-15201California3,879 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brunetti, J.

Appellant Barbara Dytrt (“Dytrt”) sued her employer, appellee The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company (“Mountain Bell”), alleging federal claims under §§ 404 and 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1104 , 1140, and a state law claim for the breach of the express and implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, pursuant to Mountain Bell’s disallowance of Dytrt’s attempted withdrawal of her decision to take early retirement. The district court granted summary judgment for Mountain Bell on the ERISA claims, dismissed the state law claim, and awarded Mountain Bell attorney’s fees. We reverse the summary judgment on the ERISA claims, affirm the dismissal of the state law claims, vacate the award of attorney’s fees, and remand.

A. Facts and Procedural Background

The facts of this case are undisputed. Appellant Barbara Dytrt worked for appel-lee Mountain Bell for thirty-one years in various management positions. In December 1986 she took the position of Facilities-Force Staff Manager in Mountain Bell’s Marketing/Products Operator Service segment in Tempe, Arizona. Lois Schmidt, Director of Marketing, told her shortly after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.