Bell v. City of Kellogg

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 303·922 F.2d 1418·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 92·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 293
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 8, 199190-35368California3,537 words

Opinion

Opinion

922 F.2d 1418 Guy Stuart BELL, on behalf of himself and all other taxpayers, citizens and electors of the City of Kellogg, Plaintiff-Appellant, and William H. Lamphere, on behalf of himself and all other state and federal taxpayers, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF KELLOGG; United States Department of Agriculture Division of Forest Service; Bunker Limited Partnership; Charles L.A. Cox, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 89-35685, 89-35686 and 90-35368. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 5, 1990 * . Decided Jan. 8, 1991. Guy Stuart Bell, Kellogg, Idaho, pro se. William H. Lamphere, Whitesboro, N.Y., pro se. John O. Cossell, Wallace, Idaho, Charles L.A. Cox, Evans, Keane, Koontz, Boyd, Simko & Ripley, Kellogg, Idaho, Nancy A. Pohlman, Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho; D. Marc Haws, Asst. U.S. Atty., Boise, Idaho, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, WRIGHT and NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: 1 The two pro se appellants before us are unhappy with the results of a local tax levy election. Federal court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.