United States v. David Taketa and Thomas O'Brien

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 307·923 F.2d 665·1991 WL 594·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 86·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 314
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 8, 199188-1022, 88-1024California878 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beezer, J.

David Taketa, a Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) agent, and Thomas O’Brien, an officer of the Nevada Bureau of Investigations (“NBI”), appeal their convictions for illegal wiretapping. The appellants contend that their convictions were obtained through the use of evidence seized in violation of the fourth amendment, that videotape evidence was improperly admitted, and that the district court improperly commented on the evidence. We hold that there was no fourth amendment violation by the warrantless search of O’Brien’s office. However, we hold that the admission into evidence of a videotape of O’Brien and Taketa violated the fourth amendment, and consequently reverse their convictions.

I

The facts of this case resemble a bad spy novel. David Taketa was the Special Agent in charge of the DEA office at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada. He shared the office with Thomas O’Brien, an NBI officer assigned to the DEA airport office for the purpose of joint federal-state investigations, but not working directly for the DEA. Another DEA agent, Leroy Kenneth Hartung, also worked at the airport office.

On April 3, 1986, DEA Agent Beth Walther Latheberry reported…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.