Patricia L. Preston La Juan M. Mitchell Leonard Jamar Preston v. United States

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 710·923 F.2d 731·1991 WL 2872·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 456·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 477
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 199188-6166California2,567 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

Patricia A. Preston, La Juan M. Mitchell, and Leonard Jamar Preston (collectively, “the heirs”), heirs of Leonard Preston, Jr. (“Preston”), appeal from a judgment in favor of the United States in a wrongful death action brought under the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b), 2671, et seq. The heirs’ sole contention on appeal is that the district court erred in denying two motions for recusal of Judge J. Spencer Letts of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The first recusal motion, which is the only motion we consider in this appeal, was made on the ground that, prior to being appointed to the federal bench, Judge Letts was “of counsel” to the law firm of Latham & Watkins. The law firm represented Hughes Aircraft Company (“Hughes”), Preston’s employer at the time of his death. Although Hughes was never a party to the litigation before Judge Letts, had judgment been rendered against the government a potential claim for indemnification against Hughes would have been triggered under a contract between Hughes and the government.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We vacate the judgment and remand to the district court for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.