Barrajas
United States v. Barrajas
Opinion
Opinion
923 F.2d 863 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose BARRAJAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50561. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 5, 1990. Decided Jan. 23, 1991. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, PREGERSON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Barrajas was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to distribute heroin and possession of heroin with intent to distribute. Barrajas raises seven issues on this appeal. We reject each of Barrajas' contentions and affirm. 3 Barrajas claims his oral waiver of his Miranda rights was ineffective in light of his refusal to sign a written Miranda waiver form. Both the Supreme Court and this court have held that the district court may properly find a waiver of Miranda rights despite a suspect's failure to sign a waiver form. North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369, 371, 375-76 (1979); United States v. Boyce, 594 F.2d 1246,…