Hahn
United States v. Hahn
Opinion
Opinion
923 F.2d 864 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lowell HAHN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50053. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1991. * Decided Jan. 15, 1991. Before HUG, POOLE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lowell Hahn appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for one count of bail jumping in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3146 . 1 Hahn claims the evidence was insufficient to prove that his failure to appear at his own trial was willful. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 In reviewing sufficiency challenges, we ask whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and drawing all reasonable inferences, there was relevant evidence from which the jury could reasonably have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Disla, 805 F.2d 1340, 1348 (9th…