Mary Rivera Dennis Rivera v. United States

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 1368·924 F.2d 948·1991 WL 8595·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1256·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 835
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 199190-35218California3,356 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Mary and Dennis Rivera appeal the dismissal of their claims against the United States, brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b) & 2674 (1988), and the first and fifth amendments to the Constitution. They alleged that Mary Rivera’s supervisor at the Air Force base where she was employed retaliated against her for notifying a superior about the supervisor’s late arrivals at work and occasional complete absences. The district court granted the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) & (6). We affirm.

FACTS

According to the plaintiffs’ complaint, Mary Rivera was a civilian employee of the United States Air Force at Fairchild Air Force Base, in Spokane County, Washington, where she began working in the library in 1980. In December 1986, Ms. Sherry Hokanson became Rivera’s supervisor. Rivera soon noticed that Hokanson frequently arrived late for work and occasionally failed to show up at all, providing no notice, guidance, or instruction to Rivera and the other library employees. In February 1987, Rivera informed Captain Schneider,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.