Chou

924 F.2d 1062 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Prudence Sui-Ning CHOU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-15629. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 7, 1990. * Decided Jan. 31, 1991. Before FARRIS, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Prudence Sui-Ning Chou appeals in propria persona the district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination action against the University of California for her failure to comply with a court order compelling discovery, and the dismissal of her motion to reconsider the dismissal. She argues that her failure to comply with the order compelling discovery was not willful or in bad faith, and that dismissal therefore was inappropriate. We affirm. 3 Chou alleged in her complaint that professors at the University of California denied her employment on account of her race and sex in violation of Title VII…