United States v. Victor Hugo X

924 F.2d 1064 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VICTOR HUGO X (Juvenile), Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50402. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 21, 1990. * Decided Jan. 28, 1991. Before HUG, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Victor Hugo X, a juvenile, appeals his conviction, following a bench trial, for juvenile delinquency for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 5032 and 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). He contends that there was insufficient evidence to convict him. Because we conclude, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, that there was sufficient evidence to convict him, we affirm. See United States v. Harris, 792 F.2d 866, 868 (9th Cir.1986). 3 We reject Hugo X's claim that the government did not adequately prove that the evidence tested to be cocaine was obtained…