Guerrero-Aguilar

United States v. Guerrero-Aguilar

Good Law
925 F.2d 1471
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 199136-3_28California764 words

Opinion

Opinion

925 F.2d 1471 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Arnulfo GUERRERO-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-10240. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1991. * Decided Feb. 6, 1991. Before TANG, SCHROEDER and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Arnulfo Guerrero-Aguilar appeals his conviction, following a guilty plea, for one count of possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A)(ii)(II). Guerrero-Aguilar contends that the district court erred by accepting his guilty plea without establishing a factual basis and without informing him of the nature of the charges against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. 3 The voluntariness of a guilty plea is reviewed de novo, United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 320 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.