Tomas v. Rubin

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 2243·926 F.2d 906·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2846·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1391
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 199190-15201California2,965 words

Opinion

Opinion

926 F.2d 906 Joy TOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Winona RUBIN, individually and in her capacity as Director of the Hawaii Department of Human Services; Catherine Jean Carman, individually and in her capacity as Administrator of the Hawaii Child Support Enforcement Agency, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-15201. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 7, 1990. Decided Feb. 26, 1991. John Ishihara, Legal Aid Society of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellant. Thomas D. Farrell, Deputy Atty. Gen., and G. Cher Foerster, Deputy Attorney Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees. Before SKOPIL, BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. BEEZER, Circuit Judge: 1 Joy Tomas appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of Hawaii's Department of Human Services (DHS) and Child Support Enforcement Agency (CSEA) (together, the Agencies). The Agencies determined that she was ineligible for benefits under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program (AFDC) because she did not cooperate in identifying the father of her child, despite her attestation that she had divulged all the relevant information she possessed. We hold that such an attestation may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.