Underwriters At Lloyds v. Denali Seafoods, Inc.

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 2453·927 F.2d 459·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 3044·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1675
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 199190-35204California3,223 words

Opinion

Opinion

927 F.2d 459 1991 A.M.C. 3000 UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, and other London Underwriters Under Primary Policy No. A84/14660 and Excess Insurance Policies Issued to Denali Seafoods, Inc., on or about March 22, 1984, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DENALI SEAFOODS, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and Mary Scanlon, individually, and as the special administratrix of the Estate of John F. Scanlon, Jr., and as the natural guardian of Leif Eric Scanlon, a minor; Lance Scanlon; Patrick Scanlon; and Erica Scanlon, Defendants/Intervenors-Appellants. No. 90-35204. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 11, 1991. Decided Feb. 28, 1991. Kurt M. LeDoux, LeDoux & LeDoux, Kodiak, Alaska, for defendants-intervenors-appellants. David Danielson, Michelle Buhler, Danielson, Harrigan & Tollefson, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Before WRIGHT, BRUNETTI and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: 1 We consider how the law of waiver and estoppel applies in Washington when an insurance company breaches its duty to defend its insured. BACKGROUND 2 A detailed statement of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.