United States v. Jose Fernando Garcia-Garcia

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 2584·927 F.2d 489·1991 WL 26032·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 3257·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1690
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 199190-50100California799 words

Opinion

Opinion

This case requires us to decide whether an appealable issue is presented when a district court declines to depart downward from the applicable sentencing guideline range, but makes no finding that it has authority to do so if it wished.

Jose Fernando Garcia-Garcia appeals his sentence, imposed under the United States Sentencing Guidelines and within the applicable guideline range, following his conviction by guilty plea for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). He contends that the district court erred by failing to rule on whether it had authority to depart below the applicable guideline range. Because we conclude that the district court has no obligation affirmatively to state that it does have authority to depart, when its authority to do so is not otherwise in dispute, the failure to depart remains discretionary and a sentence imposed within the applicable guideline range is not unlawful. The issue presented by Garcia is therefore unappealable, and we dismiss.

I

The presentence report calculated Garcia’s guideline range at 21-27 months in prison. He argued for a downward departure due to the fact that he would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.