United States v. Susana Sanchez-Robles

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 3247·927 F.2d 1070·1991 WL 35805·32 Fed. R. Serv. 673·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4507
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 199190-50018California4,743 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rymer, J.

ORDER

The appellee’s request for publication is GRANTED.

The opinion and memorandum dispositions filed January 17, 1991, are withdrawn and the attached opinion filed in its stead authored by Judge Rymer.

OPINION

A jury found Susana Sanchez-Robles guilty of importing cocaine, importing marijuana and possessing marijuana and cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a), 952 & 960. She appeals on grounds of insufficiency of the evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, error in several evidentiary rulings and error in giving a “deliberate ignorance” instruction under United States v. Jewell, 532 F.2d 697 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976), where the only evidence to support a Jewell instruction was her presence in a van which agents said reeked of marijuana. Because there were no circumstances to arouse in Sanchez-Robles’s mind a suspicion of illegal activity aside from the strong odor and because that odor, if recognized, would establish only her actual knowledge of illegality and not deliberate ignorance, the Jewell instruction was inappropriate. Accordingly, we reverse.

I. Facts

Sanchez-Robles, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.