Hubbard v. United Airlines

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 2773·927 F.2d 1094·136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2750·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 3573·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1725
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 199190-15187California2,629 words

Opinion

Opinion

927 F.2d 1094 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2750 , 59 USLW 2603 , 118 Lab.Cas. P 10,601 , RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7711 Norma Kay HUBBARD, Individually, and on Behalf of all Plaintiffs Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, the Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd., a Hawaii Corp., Hartford Life & Accident Company, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-15187. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1990. Decided March 8, 1991. Kurt A. Gronau, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellant. Richard M. Rand, Torkildson, Katz, Jossem, Fonseca, Jaffe & Moore, and Diane W. Wong, Libkuman, Ventura, Ayabe, Chong & Nishimoto, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Before SKOPIL, BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. BEEZER, Circuit Judge: 1 Norma Kay Hubbard appeals the district court's order granting a motion to dismiss her RICO action against her employer and other defendants. 741 F.Supp. 195 . The district court concluded that the Railway Labor Act (RLA) preempts her claims. We affirm. 2 * Hubbard's complaint alleged RICO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.