Harris

Harris v. City of Pittsburg

Good Law
928 F.2d 408
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 199136-3_15California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

928 F.2d 408 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack Lee HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF PITTSBURG, Defendant, and Leonard Castiglione, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Pittsburg; Anthony Donato, individually and in his capacity as City Manager of the City of Pittsburg; William Hendricks, Defendants-Appellants. No. 89-16024. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 10, 1990. Decided March 18, 1991. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CV-86-2101-MHP, MARILYN H. PATEL, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before SNEED, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiff Jack Harris, formerly a sergeant with the Pittsburg Police Department, filed this action against the Pittsburg Police Chief, the City Manager, and a fellow police officer. Harris claims that his dismissal from the police force…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.