Burt v. Hennessey

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 3298·929 F.2d 457·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4427·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2036
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 199186-2651California1,518 words

Opinion

Opinion

929 F.2d 457 Benton D. BURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HENNESSEY, Sheriff of San Francisco County; William W. Davis, Under-Sheriff of S.F. County; Osuna, Ch. Dep. Sheriff; Pisciotta, Sheriff Sg.; Randy Darr, Attorney for Prisoner's Services for the San Francisco County Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-2651. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 13, 1991. * Decided March 21, 1991. Benton D. Burt, San Francisco, Cal., in pro. per. David A. Donner, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before GOODWIN, TANG and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: 1 Benton Burt, while a pretrial detainee in the San Francisco County Jail, sued the Sheriff and others under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 , alleging that he was confined under illegal and unconstitutional conditions. After a bench trial, the district court concluded that Burt had been subjected to punishment in violation of his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments and awarded Burt $500 in damages. He appeals the denial of his cost bill as well as the parsimonious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.