James Jeffrey Grady v. United States

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 3388·929 F.2d 468·1991 WL 38212·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4683·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2131
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 199189-35583California1,368 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beezer, J.

James Jeffrey Grady, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . The district court held that Grady’s claims were covered by § 2255 but denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

I

On May 26, 1987, Grady was charged with two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). The same day, he pleaded guilty to both counts. On July 16, 1987, a district judge in the United States District Court, District of Oregon, sentenced Grady to a twelve-year suspended sentence and five years probation. The suspended sentence and probation were conditioned on Grady completing a residential drug treatment program.

On October 22, 1987, Grady was discharged from his drug treatment program before its completion for noncompliance with program rules and policies. On January 10, 1988, the district court revoked Grady’s suspended sentence and probation on the ground that Grady had failed to complete the drug treatment program. The district court sentenced Grady to ten years imprisonment.

On May 6, 1988, Grady moved to reduce his sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). The district court denied the motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.