Hydro Systems, Inc. v. Continental Insurance Company, a New Jersey Corporation

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 3395·929 F.2d 472·1991 WL 38213·21 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20702·32 ERC (BNA) 2043
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 199189-55953California2,649 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiggins, J.

Hydro Systems, Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against it in its action for breach of an insurance contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. This court has diversity jurisdiction over the appellant’s timely appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1332 . We affirm the judgment of the district court.

BACKGROUND

Appellant Hydro Systems, Inc. (“Hydro”) manufactures fiberglass bathtubs at a plant located in Simi Valley, California. The manufacturing process involves three raw materials: fiberglass, gel coat and resin. Gel Coat and resin are chemical compounds consisting, in part, of a hydrocarbon known as styrene. During Hydro’s manufacturing process, gaseous styrene is liberated from the gel coat and resin and dispersed into the air through exhaust fans and stacks.

During the spring and summer of 1988, residents of a Simi Valley neighborhood (the “Greek Tract”) made complaints about the odors connected with the styrene emissions from Hydro’s plant. The complaints were made to Simi Valley officials and the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.

On April 15, 1988, the City of Simi Valley Community Services Department, Code Enforcement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.