United States v. Jason Houser

Caution
91 Daily Journal DAR 3941·929 F.2d 1369·1990 WL 277394·32 Fed. R. Serv. 15·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5568
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 199190-30043California2,436 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Jason Houser appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, claiming that the government failed to give the defense required discovery materials, that the elements of conspiracy were not established, and that evidence was improperly admitted by the district court. In addition, Houser claims that the career offender sentence he received was improper under the federal sentencing guidelines. We affirm appellant’s conviction but vacate his sentence.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 25,, 1988, Margaret Schmit-tou, a co-conspirator in this case, agreed to deliver an ounce of methamphetamine to William Mountsier. Schmittou did not know at the time that Mountsier was an undercover DEA agent.

At approximately 7:00 PM on September 8,1988, Mountsier phoned Schmittou at her home and asked her to obtain methamphetamine. During that conversation, Schmit-tou’s husband, Paul Schmittou, a friend named Mike Kuchera and appellant Jason Houser were also in her home. Sehmit-tou’s conversation was taped by Mountsier. Schmittou told Mountsier that she had been unable to obtain drugs for him. The critical portion of the conversation with regard to Houser’s conviction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.