Carol Van Strum Paul E. Merrell v. John C. Lawn

Good Law
929 F.2d 1384
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 199189-35656California3,079 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Appellants Carol Van Strum and Paul Merrell appeal the district court’s dismissal of their suit against a number of federal and county officials. Appellants assert that these officials subjected appellants’ home to frequent and harassing helicopter and fixed-wing aircraft overflights in retaliation for appellants’ public opposition to the use of herbicides on national forest land. In the court below, appellants pursued Bivens claims (Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971)), section 1983 claims ( 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ), and NEPA claims (the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.). The district court granted appellees’ motions to dismiss and for summary judgment on all counts. The majority of the issues presented in this case are resolved in an unpublished memorandum disposition pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. We decide the statute of limitations question raised by appellants’ Bivens claims in this opinion.

I.

Appellants, husband and wife, reside on land abutting the Siuslaw National Forest in Oregon. The parcel is approximately 28 acres in size. The national forest land is managed by the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.