City of San Francisco v. Clark

Good Law
1 Cal. 386
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 15, 1851California327 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bennett, J.

By the Court,

The action was brought for the purpose of perpetually enjoining the defendants from driving piles in a street in the city of San Francisco known as Front street. The defendant, Clark, claims to be the owner of certain *387 lands bounded on Front street, and was engaged in driving piles for the purpose of making his lot accessible by way of this street, when the injunction was served upon him. It seems to have been conceded, on the argument, that the place where the defendants were driving piles, was a part of Front street, and the only question in the case is, whether the piles were an obstruction to the free use of the street by the public. It is well known as a matter of fact, that Front street, as laid down on the map of the city, lies below low water mark in the bay of San Francisco, and it is equally well known, as a matter of fact, that the ordinary method, if not the only one, of making this street and others similarly situated capable of use, is by driving piles and by planking over them. The defendant was enjoined from doing the very thing, by which alone Front street could be made passable ; and how such act could be an obstruction to the street it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.