Visher

Bates v. Visher

Good Law
2 Cal. 355
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 15, 1852California147 words

Lead Opinion

Heydeneeldt, J.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

The error relied on to reverse this judgment, is, that the trial was by referees, and not by a jury, and that the reference was not authorized. On looking into the record, it appears that there is an entry upon the minutes, which recites that “ the parties came by their attorneys, and defendant by his attorney, moved the Court, that the cause be referred,” &c. Thus the reference was made on the appellant’s motion, and in one of the modes pointed out by law “ by oral consent in . open Court entered on the minutes.”

It is only necessary to state thus much to show that the ob *358 jection is entirely unsupported. Indeed the case must be treated as a delay case, and the judgment affirmed with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Anderson, Justice, concurred.