Navis
People v. Navis
3 Cal. 106
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 15, 1853California54 words
Lead Opinion
Heydenfeldt, J.
delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.
Where the admission or confession of a party is resorted to as evidence, it is error to exclude any portion of it made at the same time as the part which is related.
For this reason, the judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.