New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Albert Vieira

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 3987·930 F.2d 696·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5565·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2507
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 199189-16291California4,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

930 F.2d 696 NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee. v. Albert VIEIRA, and Vieira Drywall and Taping Company, Inc., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants. No. 89-16291. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 15, 1991. Decided April 8, 1991. Stephen J. Kottmeier, Hopkins & Carley, San Jose, Cal., for defendants-counterclaimants-appellants. Kathleen E. Hegen, Boornazian, Jensen & Garthe, Oakland, Cal., for plaintiff-counterdefendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before FLETCHER, NORRIS and TROTT, Circuit Judges. TROTT, Circuit Judge: 1 New Hampshire Insurance Company ("New Hampshire") sought reimbursement from Albert Vieira and Vieira Drywall ("Vieira") for $300,000 it paid in settlement of a claim against Vieira. The district court found that the loss sustained--diminution of value--was not "property damage" covered under the applicable insurance contract, and granted summary judgment for New Hampshire. We affirm. 2 * A general contractor hired Vieira to install drywall in the rooms and attics of three low-income housing projects. When the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.