Hutchinson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Possession is always prima facie evidence of title, and proof of prior possession is enough to maintain ejectment against a mere naked trespasser.

The allegation that the plaintiff was in possession at the the time of the ouster complained of, is a sufficient allegation of title to make the declaration good.

The demurrer was, therefore, improperly sustained.

The judgment is reversed with costs, and the cause remanded.