United States v. Craig Hoyungowa

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 4287·930 F.2d 744·1991 WL 54108·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 6013·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2647
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 199189-10485California1,739 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tang, J.

Craig Hoyungowa appeals the district court’s upward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines in sentencing him for the murder of Dean James, a Bureau of Indian Affairs officer. The district court departed upwardly because of Hoyun-gowa’s criminal history, the psychological impact on James’ family, and the victim’s status as a law enforcement officer. We reverse and remand for resentencing.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On September 17, 1988, Hoyungowa and two juveniles were hitchhiking together on the Hopi Indian Reservation in Arizona. Hoyungowa, who was twenty-three years old, had escaped from detention on misdemeanor charges in the Hopi Tribal Jail. Two state warrants for Hoyungowa’s arrest were also outstanding; one for failure to appear in court in Flagstaff, Arizona, and another for kidnapping in Gallup, New Mexico.

According to the two juveniles, Dean James, a police officer with the Bureau of Indian Affairs, stopped his vehicle near the three hitchhikers and asked Hoyungowa to identify himself. The two juveniles fled, they said, when Hoyungowa pulled out a sawed-off rifle and pointed it at James. Hoyungowa stated that, as he was backing away from James, he tripped,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.