Davis

Shaw & Reed v. Davis

Good Law
5 Cal. 466
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1855California92 words

Lead Opinion

Murray, J.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

On the trial of this cause in the Court below, the plaintiffs intro *467 duced as a witness one Webb, who testified on his voir dire, that he had negotiated the contract between the parties, and that his brokerage or compensation depended on the plaintiff's recovery; as it was a custom among brokers not to charge commissions in case a sale miscarried.

The witness was incompetent, and should have been excluded; inasmuch as he was directly interested in the event of the suit.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.