Reina

Reina v. Cross

Good Law
6 Cal. 29
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1856California644 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Terry, J.

Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt concurred.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover from defendant certain money advanced on a contract of affreightment.

The complaint alleges that defendant contracted to carry certain freight from the port of Acapulco to Valparaiso, in consideration of a certain sum of money, a portion of which was paid by plaintiff in advance. That defendant received said freight on board his vessel and departed on the voyage, but did not perform his contract, because of the loss of said vessel at sea.

The complaint also contains a second count for money received to the use of plaintiff. To this complaint defendant demurred, on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Court below sustained the demurrer, and judgment was rendered in favor of defendant. From this judgment, plaintiff appealed.

The second count of the complaint is bad, because it is not alleged that demand had been made on defendant. A party receiving money to the use of another, is rightfully in possession until the same is demanded. ■> ^

The only question involved in this case is, the right of plaintiff to recover advanced freight money…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.