Thompson

Thompson v. Williams

Good Law
6 Cal. 88
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1856California367 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Heydenfeldt, J.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

Objection is made to the power of the County Judge to grant injunctions. The Constitution, after fixing and limiting the power of this official, as Judge of the County and Probate Courts, and Court of Sessions, adds that “he shall perform such other duties as shall be required by law.”

The jurisdiction of each of the Courts established by the Constitution is specifically pointed out by that instrument, and we have repeatedly held that the Legislature has no power to alter the Constitutional boundaries.

But the grant of authority to the County Judge to award injunctions in eases brought into the District Court, is not trenching upon the limits of jurisdiction of any of the Courts. It is a mere power to issue a process auxiliary to the proper jurisdiction of the District Court. The County Judge does not try or decide the case, nor does any Court of which he is Judge take jurisdiction of it; he only issues a mesne process. In the revenue cases, decided at the January Term, 1854, 4 Cal. R., we held that the Legislature possessed every power not prohibited to it by the Constitution, either expressly or by clear implication.

There is evidently no express…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.