Wolf

Wolf v. Fogarty

Good Law
1856 Cal. LEXIS 101·6 Cal. 224
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1856California352 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Terry, J.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

The only question presented by the record, is as to the sufficiency of a certificate of acknowledgment to a certain mortgage given by one Duprey to defendant Fogarty. The certificate is as follows :

Under our statute, the acknowledgment or proof of execution is a necessary part of the conveyance, without which it cannot be admitted to record, so as to operate as notice to third parties. (Sec. 1 of Act concerning conveyances, Comp. Laws, p. 513.)

Section six of said Act provides, that “ No acknowledgment of any conveyance whereby any real estate is conveyed, or may be affected, shall be taken, unless the person offering to make such acknowledgment shall be personally known to the officer taking the same to be the person whose name is subscribed to such conveyance, as a party thereto, or shall be proven to be such, by the oath or affirmation of a credible witness.”

Section seven, requires that the knowledge or proof of identity shall* be stated in the certificate of acknowledgment.

The importance and ■ necessity of this strictness in regard to conveyances is obvious. The certificate under consideration does not comply with the statute,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.