Roberts

Roberts v. Treadwell

Good Law
50 Cal. 520
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1875No. 4736California73 words

lead Opinion

The complaint did not allege that the defendant had not paid the indebtedness, for the recovery of which this action was brought. It merely averred “that the whole thereof is now due.” This defect in the complaint was pointed out by a special demurrer, which was overruled. The insufficiency of the complaint in the respect indicated was adverted to in Frisch v. Caler ( 21 Cal. 71 ).

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Roberts · Supreme Court of California · 1875 | Caselegis