McKee

County of Monterey v. McKee

Good Law
51 Cal. 255
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1876No. 4923California68 words

lead Opinion

It is not necessary to decide whether the county judge had authority to hear or determine the motion to discharge the attachment, since, assuming he had jurisdiction, he determined it wrongly.

The official bond of the defendant as county treasurer was an obligation for the direct payment of money. (San Francisco v. Brader, 50 Cal. 506 ; Hathaway v. Davis, 83 Cal. 161 .)

Order appealed from reversed.