Curry

Curry v. White

Good Law
51 Cal. 530
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1876No. 5307California52 words

lead Opinion

The defendants, McMullen and Roundtree, are not responsible upon the note in the case, which was made after the *532 dissolution of the partnership. Nor are they responsible upon the original account, because the same was barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Judgment and order reversed as to -the-defendants, McMullen and Roundtree.

Curry · Supreme Court of California · 1876 | Caselegis